Vallabhapurapu Subhasini v. State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6766/2021 · 2026-03-08
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23894 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23894 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010461782021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6766/2021 Between:
1.VALLABHAPURAPU SUBHASINI,, W/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. YARLAGADDA VARIGUDEM, PRODDHUTURU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2.PEDAPUDI SIRIVENNELA, , W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O. YARLAGADDA VARIGUDEM, PRODDHUTURU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.PEDAPUDI SRINIVASA RAO,, SIO. NANCHARAIAH, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O. PAMIDIMUKALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DSITRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATIRESPONDENT 2.VALLABAPURPAU VANI LATHA, @ VANILATHA KODALI, W/O. SUNIL KUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. PEDDAGUDEM, H/O. GHANTASALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.THARIGOPULA SURYA CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
2 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.RAMANI ANNAM The Court made the following:
ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. It is also pertinent to observe that the present case constitutes one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. The non- appearance of the Petitioner, despite the long pendency of the matter, reflects a lack of diligence. In view of the absence of representation and the failure to advance
arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.03.2026 VTS