Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23893 (CHH)

RAJU MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3283/2026 · 2026-06-29

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26684 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3283 of 2026 1 - Raju Mishra Son of Ramlakhan, Aged About 73 Years, Resident of Village Kunda, P.S. Kunda Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Ramesh Chauhan, Son Of Mangal Chauhan Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Village Kunda, P.S. Kunda Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Shiv Kumar Chauhan, Son Of Dukalu Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Kunda, P.S. Kunda Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Sadhram Sonwani Son Of Ratan Sonwani Aged About 67 Years Resident Of Village Kunda, P.S. Kunda Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan New Mantralaya Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Tahsildar, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kunda, P.S. Kunda, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.07.01 11:32:03 +0530 2 5 - Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kunda, P.S. Kunda, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. CK Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. GA SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs : (i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned notices dated 16.06.2026 (Annexure P-1), in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned notice dated 16.6.2026 for removal of encroachment has been issued, whereby the concerned Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Kunda has directed the demolition of the house in question, wherein the petitioners reside, by deploying a JCB. 3 4. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, the petitioner is at liberty to file a reply before the concerned Gram Panchayat and in turn, the concerned Gam Panchayat is directed to consider the said reply and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, keeping in view that the rainy season has commenced. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the Petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay