Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2389 (PAT)

Rakesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/327/2026 · 2026-04-23

Sandeep Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.327 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2025 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Rakesh Yadav Son of Suresh Yadav @ Surendra yadav Resident of Village- Amba PS -Jhajha Distt- Jamui 2. Mithun Yadav Son of Suresh Yadav @ Surendra Yadav Resident of Village- Amba PS -Jhajha Distt- Jamui ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar bihar 2. Rinku Devi Wife of Late Purushottam Manjhi Resident of Village- Amba PS -Jhajha Distt- Jamui ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Pintu Kumar Patel For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 23-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui whereby the bail application of the appellants in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 464 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1) of the BNS and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act, was rejected. 3. The appellants, making allegations of theft, have taken the deceased and one Vishal Manjhi with them and thereafter brutally assaulted and electrocuted them because of Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.327 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 which the deceased died. 4. The appellants are in custody since 27.09.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants are innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. 6. Learned Special P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellants. 7. Considering the facts of the case and also considering the nature of allegation levelled against the appellants, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 8. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U