Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2389 (GAU)

SAHIL ALI AHMED v. THE STATE OIF ASSAM

Crl.Pet./278/2026 · 2026-03-12

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010038262026 2026:GAU-AS:3666 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./278/2026 SAHIL ALI AHMED S/O SADRUD ALI RESIDENT OF SOUTH AMOLAPATTY, DIBRUGARH WEST, P.O. DIBRUGARH, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786001 VERSUS THE STATE OIF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : A RAHMAN, J PEGU Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Date : 13.03.2026. Heard S. Sur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Rahman, learned engaged counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/2 In pursuant to the order dated 27.02.2026, an additional affidavit has been filed brining the order sheets in the case record. However, on perusal of the case record and as pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant/ complainant has not been made a party in this case, who is a necessary party, as the case relates to N.I. Act case. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to this technical error, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition, with a liberty to file afresh. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed, with an opportunity to file afresh, if so advised. The present petition stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant