Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23885 (KAR)

MR SRINIVASULU B V v. MR LOKESH K

CRL.RP/1595/2024 · 2026-06-23

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31327 CRL.RP No. 1595 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1595 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR SRINIVASULU B V AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O VENKATAIAH NO.94, HARIKUSH NILAYA 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD THAMMAIAH GARDEN ABBIGERE BENGALURU-560 090 …PETITIONER (BY SRI DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: MR LOKESH K AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O MR G N KRISHNAPPA NO.34, ANUBHANDA NILAYA 2ND CROSS, ABBIGERE BENGALURU-560090 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJESH A, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE HONORABLE COURT OF XII ACMM, AT BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.14261/2020 DTD 15.04.2024 AND ETC. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31327 CRL.RP No. 1595 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. The counsel for the respondent submits that the conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioner. 3. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that the matter was referred to the mediation but was not settled before the mediation. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN