D.Velugonda Reddy v. The Southern Power Distribution Company Of Andhra Pradesh
WP/12835/2013 · 2026-02-04
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23881 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23881 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010292262013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12824/2013 Between:
1. SMT. G. PRABHAVATHI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, W/O. M.DEVADAS, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, H.NO. 6/88, BANAVASI VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. DIST COLLECTOR KURNOOL DISTRICT 2 OTHERS, -
2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S.PROJECT, WOMEN & CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL. KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER, I.C.D.S. PROJECT, YEMMIGNAUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents calling for applications to fill up the vacancy of Anganawadi Worker at Banavasi Village without appointing the petitioner in spite of her selection in the interview conducted on 19.01.2011 by the Selection Committee as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to issue orders appointing the petitioner as Anganawadi Worker at Banavasi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District and pass. 2
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15783 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to fill up the vacancy of Anganawadi Worker at Banavasi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool district, pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
1. The petitioner is challenging the inaction of respondent in promoting the petitioner to the post of Senior Line Inspector against the existing vacancy in Ongole Circle, Prakasam District. 2. The respondent has filed a counter stating that the petitioner was placed at Serial No.80 and this was done after rectifying the mistake which initially listed the petitioner at Serial No.16. Considering the age of the petitioner at the time of filing of the writ petition, no further orders are required to be passed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
05.02.2026 RMD
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12835/2013
05.02.2026 RMD