Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23878 (AP)

SMT DULAM SWATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23629/2024 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010459062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23629/2024 Between: 1. SMT DULAM SWATHI, W/O DULAM SHYAM PHANI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER OF M/S D.N.R FARMERS HAVING ITS OFFICE AT KAIKALURU TOWN AND MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADES 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KAIKALURU TOWN CIRCLE ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction, order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No. 5 in indulging, involving and interfering with the right, title, interest and peaceful possession of the Petitioner on leasehold property which is using for fish cultivation as arbitrary, unconstitutional, unwarranted and illegal in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents restraining them not to indulge, involve and / or interfere with the right, title, interest and peaceful possession of the property held by the Petitioner on lease and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondents restraining them not to indulge, involve and / or interfere with the right, title, interest and peaceful possession of the leasehold lands held by the Petitioner on lease pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R YELLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23629/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction, order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No. 5 in indulging, involving and interfering with the right, title, interest and peaceful possession of the Petitioner on leasehold property which is using for fish cultivation as arbitrary, unconstitutional, unwarranted and illegal in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents restraining them not to indulge, involve and / or interfere with the right, title, interest and peaceful possession of the property held by the Petitioner on lease and to pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23629/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 230 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO WRIT PETITION NO: 23629/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV