1 2026:CGHC:26397 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 770 of 2023 • Jeevan Masram S/o Baran Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bairakh, Post And Police Station Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Matralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 3. Forest Divisional Officer Forest Divisional, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 4. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 5. Conservator Of Forest Forest Department, Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 6. Tahsildar Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 7. Bajaro Bai W/o Son Singh Baiga, R/o Village Amalidih, P.S. Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. B. L. Sahu, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 6 : Mr. Anadi Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned memo dated 09.01.2023 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the respondent No.6 in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances fo the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the concerned authorities for returning of his articles, which was subsequently seized after the demolition proceedings. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of, granting aforesaid liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the concerned authorities, if such an application is filed, the concerned authorities are directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha