Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23874 (AP)

Yarasani Renuka v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27886/2021 · 2026-01-05

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010459462021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 27886/2021 Between: 1. YARASANI RENUKA,, W/O. SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO.516/80, SWATHI SAI FANCY, SITHARAMA TOWNSHIP, AT HOUSING BOARD COLONY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SECRETARY, SANDEPUDI VILLAGE GRAMPANCHAYAT, TURLAPADU GRAMA SACHIVALAYAM, YEDLAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toFor the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit the petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.2 in interfereing into the house property bearing H.No.2-197, plot No.48, adm. 1.20 of Sandepudi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, Guntur District without issuing notice and without following due process of law as illegal, irregular, and violation of articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the house property bearing H.No.2-197, plot 2 No.48, adm. 120 of Sandepudi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, Guntur District pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the house property bearing H.No.2-197, plot No.48, adm. 120 of Sandepudi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, Guntur District pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 29.11.2021 in WP No .27886/2021 as divide of merits and pass such other order or orders as this to dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VELIVELA VEERARAGHAVAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: To declare the action of respondent No.2 in interfering with the petitioner’s house property bearing H.No.2-197, Plot No.48, admeasuring 120 sq. yards in Sandepudi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, Guntur District, without following law, the present writ petition is field. 2. Heard Sri V.Veera Raghavaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Sudhir, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. 3. While reiterating the contents of the affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the respondent authority was trying to interfere with the petitioner’s property, the present writ petition was filed. This Court, to protect the interest of the petitioner, passed interim orders dated 29.11.2021, thereby directing the respondents to maintain status quo. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, on counter, contended that the respondents have the intention to take steps against the petitioner’s subject property by following due process of law. 5. Taking their submissions into consideration and as the respondent authorities have intention to follow due process of law, this Court is inclined to disposed of the writ petition with the following direction:- <The respondents are directed not to interfere with the petitioner’s subject property except under due process of law.= 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 06.01.2026. JLV 5 403 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 27886/2021 Date: 06.01.2026. JLV