Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23870 (AP)

Chittela Siva Sarma v. B. Maheswar Reddy

CC/2160/2013 · 2026-03-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010457582013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2160/2013 Between: 1. CHITTELA SIVA SARMA,, SIO LATE SIVA SHANKARIAH, AGE : 43 YEARS, OCC: ARCHAKA IN SRI SATRA SALA MALLESWARA SWAMY DEVASTANAM R/O: JETTINALEM VILLAGE. RENTACHINTHALA MANDAL. GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. B MAHESWAR REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN OCC: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, NAZCENTER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. B SUBHRAMANYAM, S/O : NOT KNOWN OCC: INSPECTOR, SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMI TEMPLE, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT SATTENAPALLI POST & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. B NEMALI REDDY, S/O: NOT KNOWN, OCC: MANAGER, SRI GANGA BRALUNARAMBHA SAMETHA MALLESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, RANTECHINTHALA POST & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnor under the Contempt of Courts Act for disobedience of the orders passed in WP.MP.No 41412 of 2013 in W.P.No. 33287 of 2013 dated 21-11-2013 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2160/2013 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 21.11.2013 passed by this Court in W.P.No.33287 of 2013. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Ganesh, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case and the matter becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 56 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2160/2013 31.03.2026 TTPPSS