APHC010453042021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27335/2021 Between: 1. ABDUL KHADAR FAAMIDA, W/O ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. ABDUL KHADAR, S/O. V MOHAMMED, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF 16/2/199/A, GANDHI NAGAR, WARD NO 16-11, NELLORE ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAAAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing notice vide U.0 No 03/2021/NMC/WPRS-52 dated 09.11.2021 served on the petitioner on 15.11.2021 purportedly issued under Section 461 r/w. Sec.452 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and also Section 84(5), 88, 89(1) and 2 90 of APMRUDA Act 2016 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the notice vide LC No 03/2021/NMC/WPRS-52 dated 09.11.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent served on the petitioner on 15-11- 2021 by declaring the same as null and void and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to demolition the petitioner premises bearing Assessment No. 1031022201 corresponding to D. No. 16/2/199/A, Gandhi Nagar, Ward no 16-11, Nellore, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed petitioner as 3rd respondent in the above writ petition and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SATHEESH KUMAR EERLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 Order: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.01.2026 PNS