Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23862 (AP)

SHAIK ABDUL AZEEZ v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23508/2024 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010459042024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. SHAIK ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 13 MAHATMA GANDHI COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, III TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. DUDEKULA SADIK VALI, S/O DUDEKULA MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DO.NO.13 COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. 5. DUDEKULA DADAVALI, S/O LATE DUDEKULA PALU BABAYYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DO.NO.13 COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23508/2024 SHAIK ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 13 MAHATMA GANDHI COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, III TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. DUDEKULA SADIK VALI, S/O DUDEKULA MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DO.NO.13-1-748B, MAHATMA GANDHI COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. DUDEKULA DADAVALI, S/O LATE DUDEKULA PALU BABAYYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DO.NO.13-1-36, MAHATMA COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA SHAIK ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 13-1-486-B, MAHATMA GANDHI COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND ...PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, III TOWN POLICE STATION, DUDEKULA SADIK VALI, S/O DUDEKULA MAHABOOB, AGED 748B, MAHATMA GANDHI DUDEKULA DADAVALI, S/O LATE DUDEKULA PALU BABAYYA, 36, MAHATMA GANDHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in Civil Dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th and 5th Respondent, threatening the Petitioner to vacate the premises situated at Do.No.13-749, M.G. colony, Anantapur immediately and to handover the same to 4th Respondent, other wise to face dire consequences of forceful dispossession from the said premises and thereby interfering with personal liberty of the petitioners without any legal cause, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th and 5th Respondent and threaten, dispossess the petitioner from the premises situated at Do.No.13-749, M.G. colony, Anantapur and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. J NARAYANA SWAMY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23508/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in Civil Dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th and 5th Respondent, threatening the Petitioner to vacate the premises situated at Do.No.13-749, M.G. colony, Anantapur immediately and to handover the same to 4th Respondent, other wise to face dire consequences of forceful dispossession from the said premises and thereby interfering with personal liberty of the petitioners without any legal cause, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th and 5th Respondent and threaten, dispossess the petitioner from the premises situated at Do.No.13-749, M.G. colony, Anantapur and pass such..” 2. Heard Sri P.Sravan Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by Dudekula Sadik Vali-4th respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the police found that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and therefore no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.01.2026 KKV