1 2026:CGHC:26564-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 941 of 2026 1 - Rajan Singh Alias Singh Rajan S/o Lal Bahadur Singh Aged About 35 Years R/o Quarter No. 6, Shakti Blossom, Opposite Shakti Garden, Near Shantnu, Vatva Ring Road, New Vatva, Vatva, District Ahmedabad, Gujrat-382440 2 - Rajmatidevi Lalbahadur Singh Alias Rajmati Singh W/o Lalbahadur Rajput Aged About 57 Years R/o Quarter No. 6, Shakti Blossom, Opposite Shakti Garden, Near Shantnu, Vatva Ring Road, New Vatva, Vatva, District Ahmedabad, Gujrat-382440 3 - Lalbahadur Rajput Alias Lal Bahadur Singh S/o Indradev Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Quarter No. 6, Shakti Blossom, Opposite Shakti Garden, Near Shantnu, Vatva Ring Road, New Vatva, Vatva, District Ahmedabad, Gujrat-382440 4 - Vineeta Singh W/o Rakesh Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o Quarter No. 6, Shakti Blossom, Opposite Shakti Garden, Near Shantnu, Vatva Ring Road, New Vatva, Vatva, District Ahmedabad, Gujrat-382440 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Mahila Thana District- Durg (Cg) 2 - Pragati Singh S/o Rajan Singh Aged About 29 Years R/o Quarter No. 9b, Cross Street 04, Sector 5, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (cause title taken from CIS) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwin Panikar, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel lawyer Mr. Brijesh Chand Mishra along with Ms. Shailesh Priya, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 30/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Ashwin Panickar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the Respondent No. 1/State and Mr. Brijesh Chand Mishra, Advocate along with Ms. Shailesh Priya, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2. 2. The present CrMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following relief: "It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash FIR bearing crime number 02/2026 registered with the Police Station Mahila Thana Sector 6 Bhilai District Durg and proceedings thereto, in the interest of justice." 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present case, the charge-sheet has been filed. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr.M.P. with liberty to take recourse to law if the petitioners aggrieved by the charge-sheet. 3 4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Any interim relief granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika