Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23845 (AP)

ADAPAKA KASEELU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23518/2025 · 2026-02-03

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010458922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 23518/2025 Between: 1. ADAPAKA KASEELU, S/O APPALA NAIDU, AGE 36 YRS, OCC WORKING AS TYPIST-CUM- COMPUTER OPERATOR AT TAHSILDAR OFFICE, SANTHAKAVITI MANDAL, R/O D.NO. 1-13, MAIN ROAD, SIRIPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SHEIK HASEENA BEGUM,, W/O GAPHOOR, AGE 40 YRS, OCC WORKING AS TYPIST-CUM- COMPUTER OPERATOR AT TAHSILDAR OFFICE PALAKONDA MANDAL, R/O D.NO.341, INDIRA NAGAR COLONY, PALAKONDA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION CCLA, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SANTHAKAVITI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declaring the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings vide Rc.No.1908/2020,A2, dt 12.08.2025 terminating the petitioners from service of Data entry operators on the instigation of the direction issued by the 2nd respondent in the impugned Memo.No.REV02-28021/52/2024 (C.No.2635658) dt 02.02.2025, without following the procedure contemplated under the law as illegal, unjust, improper and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioners into service on same terms and conditions and continue them, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the 3rd respondent termination order issued in proceedings vide Rc.No.1908/2020,A2, dt: 12.08.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed letter dated 29.01.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 04.02.2026 M K K 292 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.23518 of 2025 Dated: 04.02.2026 M K K