APHC010454032017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 398/2017 Between: 1. TAMADA MOHAN KUMAR,, S/O.TAMDA GANAPATHI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF KORLAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O.KORLAM VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. TEMBU VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O.TEMBU DILLI RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF BESI RAMACHANDRAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, . R/O.BESI RAMACHANDRAPURAM VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. POKALA CHANDRASEKHAR,, S/O.JAGANNAIKULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF KARTHALAPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O.KARTHALAPALEM VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. DUDDI ROJA,, D/.O.LATE YARRYYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF PALASAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O.PALASAMPURAM VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. PINNINTI YASODA,, D/O.LATE MADAVAYYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF GOLLAVURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O.GOLLAVURU VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. TAMIRI TRINADHU,, S/O.APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT OF MAKANNAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O.MAKANNAPURAM VILLAGE, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. CHALLA MALLESWARA RAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/ MANDAL PROGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P. 2. MARPU NAGARAJU, S/O.NOT KNOWN, ASSISTANT MANDAL PORGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the Respondents herein and punish them. for willfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Hon'ble Court, passed in WPMP.No.57740 of 2016 in W.P.No.46882 of 2016, dt.03.01.2017, under the Contempt of Courts Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The court made the following ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for not complying with the interim order dated 03.01.2017, passed in W.P.M.P.No.57740 of 2016 in W.P.No.46882 of 2016. 2. When the matter is called, Sri D. Srinivasulu, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that after filing the present contempt case, the main writ petition was closed, observing that the grievance of the petitioners was considered pursuant to the interim order dated 03.01.2017. Hence, he submits that his clients are not inclined to pursue the instant contempt petition. 3 3. Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the respondents, is present and submits that the petitioner’s grievance was redressed. 4. Recording the said submission made by the respective learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.02.2026 GVK 4 154 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.398 of 2017 Date: 06.02.2026 GVK