Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23841 (CHH)

SURAJ YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/3609/2026 · 2026-06-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26658 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3609 of 2026 Suraj Yadav S/o Shiv Prasad Yadav, Aged About 28 Years R/o Near Shriram Hospital, Sattipara, Police Station-Kotwali, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Ambikapur, District-Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Amit Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 30/06/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.493/2025 registered at Police Station Ambikapur, District-Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420 of IPC, Section 61(2), 111(2), 238 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.07.01 12:52:24 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been acquitted by the learned trial Court, therefore, the present bail application has become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State, is present. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri