IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2327 of 2023 Decided on: 21st September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Veena Kumari …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Saurav, Advocate vice Mr. Piyush Rathore, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge CMP No.24230 of 2026 Allowed and disposed of. CWP No.12327 of 2023 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “(i) That office order dated 04.05.2020 (Annexure P-4) may kindly been held illegal and the same may kindly be quashed and set-aside. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 (ii) That the petitioner may kindly be considered in service upto 30.04.2022 till the age of 60 with all consequential benefits alongwith interest @ 9% per annum, keeping in view the judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No.2711 of 2017 titled as Baldev versus State of HP and others decided on 22.02.2022.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner and the reliefs prayed for by her have already been adjudicated upon in Baldev Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to consider and decide her case in light of above decision within a fixed time-schedule. Learned vice counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment by passing appropriate order, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 2 CWP No.2711 of 2017, decided alongwith connected matter on 22.02.2022 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 21, 2026 Judge Mukesh