APHC010457142022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27892/2022 Between: 1. DANDUMENU SUBRAMANYAM @ CHINNA,, PROPRIETOR OF SRI DURGA DEVI FRUITS, R/O D.NO.3-46, PANCHAYATHI STREET, CHERUVUGATTU, PALLAMPURU VILLAGE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER ANAKAPALLI, 1 TOWN POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI MAARISETTI KUMAR, PROPRIETOR OF SRI SAI FRUITS NOOKALAMMA STREET, RAJEV GANDHI INDOOR INDOOR STADIUM, ELITE APPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd respondent in threatening the petitioner to settle issue which is purely civil in nature, is highly unwarranted without jurisdiction, highly unjust, illegal and violative of articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in any manner with the civil dispute of the petitioners and 3rd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P DURGA PRASAD 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent No.2 in threatening the petitioner to settle issue, which is purely civil in nature, is highly unwarranted without jurisdiction, highly unjust, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct respondent No.2 not to interfere in any manner with the civil dispute of the petitioners and 3rd respondent and pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there is a dispute between the Petitioner and respondent No.3 with regard to business transactions and that no crime is registered against the Petitioner and the respondent police did not call him to the Police Station and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law, if any crime is registered against the Petitioner. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 27892 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*