Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2383 (PNJ)

JXXXX v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRM-M/21266/2026 · 2026-04-20

Shalini Singh Nagpal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21266-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 JXXXX …PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Nippun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Prayer in the petition is for appropriate directions to official respondents No.1 to 3 to take action against private respondent No.4, accused in FIR No.60 dated 19.02.2026 under Sections 64, 75, 123, 351, 78 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Division No.8, District Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh, submits that investigation in the FIR was complete; that police had filed cancellation report in the Court of jurisdictional Magistrate on 16.04.2026. and the case was now fixed for notice to the complainant, petitioner before this Court. Since, investigation in the FIR has already been concluded, no SUMIT SINGLA 2026.04.21 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21266-2026 (O&M) -2- directions are to be issued to official respondents to take action against private respondent No.4. However, petitioner would be at liberty to oppose the cancellation report before the concerned Court. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 20.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Singla Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUMIT SINGLA 2026.04.21 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document