APHC010447942018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21539/2018 Between: 1. MANTRI NOOKARATNAM, W/O.ISHAQ, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 67, R/O. D.NO.6-94, GOKULAPADU, TIMMAPURAM, S RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ASSIGNMENTS, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH TOWNSHIP AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 4TH FLOOR, PN BUS STAND, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature 2 of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in insisting the petitioner to vacate from her landed property acmeasuring Ac.1.65 Cents in Survey Number 366-2 of Pisinikada Village of Anakapalli Mandal, Vishakapatnam District for the purpose of providing sites/apartment houses to the weaker section people, without acquiring her land and without paying compensation as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her landed property without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her landed property in an extent of Ac.1.65 cents in Sy.No.366-2 of PisinikadaVillage,Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. PADMAJA GADIRAJU(SC FOR APTIDCO) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri M. Lalith Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. At para No.4 of the counter-affidavit filed by the 5th respondent, it was clearly stated that the subject land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.2-88 cents in Sy.No.366/2P of Pisinikada Village was withdrawn as per the revised delivery receipt issued by the 4th respondent. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands disposed of by making the interim orders, dated 27.06.2018, passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.02.2026 KAS 4 157 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21539/2018 Dated: 12.02.2026 KAS