1 2026:CGHC:26198 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3069 of 2026 1 - Monika Mandal W/o Late Sharat Chandra Mandal Aged About 83 Years R/o Subhas Nagar Ambikapur Tehsil Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Department Of Revenue And Deserter Management Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - The Commissioiner Surguja Division Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. 4 - The Collector Surguja Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. 5 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. 6 - Sub Divisional Office Revenue Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. 7 - Tehsildar Ambikapur District Surguja C.G. ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Dr. Saurabh Pande, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/06/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the allotment order of the subject land to the respondent no.5 dated 1.9.2025 issued by the respondent no.4 for construction of Mangalik Bhawan upon the subject land ANNEXURE P/10. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to restrain the respondent authorities to not make any construction upon the subject land. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decided the stay application field by the petitioner dated 29.5.2026 ANNEXURE P/12 as early as possible. 10.4 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time 3 seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat