Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010449162025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2356 OF 2025 Between:
1. K. VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/o Muneswararao, Aged 58 years, Occ Contract Supervisor, Ulavapadu (Project), SPSR Nellore District.
2. V. Ravanamma, , D/o Kurmaiah, Aged 58 years, Occ Contract Supervisor, Krupam (Project), Parvathipuram (Manyam) District. ...Petitioners AND
1. SURYA KUMARI IAS, Principal Secretary, Women Development AND Child Welfare Department, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. M VEND GOPAL REDDY I A S, Director of Women AND Child Welfare, Department Women Development AND Child Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Jampani Towers, Guntur, Guntur District.
3. K SIVA JYOTHI, Joint Director of Women AND Child Welfare, Department Women Development AND Child Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Jampani Towers, Guntur, Guntur District.
4. G CHINMAYI DEVI, Regional Joint Director, Department Women Development AND Child Welfare, Visakhapatnam Region, Visakhapatnam District.
5. S JAYALAKSHMI, Regional Joint Director, ZONE-III Department Women Development AND Child Welfare, Ongole Region, Prakasam District ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondents: U KANAKA RAJU
2
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri S. Dilip Jaya Ram, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners and Sri V. Rama Krishna, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri U. Kanaka Raju ,learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3.
2. Sri V. Rama Krishna, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri U. Kanaka Raju, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3 has submitted the Written Instructions stating that the Order has been complied with.
3. Sri S. Dilip Jaya Ram, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners, on instructions, confirms this position that the Order has been complied with and would submit that no consideration is necessary.
4. Having so recorded, this Contempt Case is closed. No Order as to Costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 11.03.2026 JKS
3
55
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2356 OF 2025
11.03.2026
JKS