APHC010455672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2366/2025 Between: 1. BODABALLA APPALANAIDU, S/O SWAMI NAIDU, AGED 48 YRS, OCC. FIELD ASSISTANT(MGNREGS) PRESENTLY UNDER TERMINATION, PEDAPADAM PANCHAYAT R/O 1-152, BAGUVALASASALURU MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAMMANYAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. K RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/o Not known to Petitioner, Aged. Not known to Petitioner, The Project Director, DWMA, parvathipurammanyam District at Parvathipuram. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for committing Contempt of Court by wilfully disobeying /violating this Hon'ble Court order dated 25.02.2025 in W.P.No 4321/2025 passed by Hon'ble Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to recall the non bailable warrant to the petitioner dated 21.11.2025 in C.C.No. 2366 of 2025 and pass p. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. U D JAI BHIMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 25.02.2025, passed in W.P.No.4312 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of on 25.02.2025. The operative portion of said order reads as follows: “Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the proceedings impugned vide Rc.No.531/2024/HRMS/Manyam, dated 22.01.2025 (Ex.P1) are set aside. The matter is remitted to the 3rd respondent. The learned 3rd respondent shall conduct the inquiry afresh by providing an opportunity for a personal hearing to the petitioner and shall pass a reasoned order within three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order strictly as per FAHRP, 2013.” 4. The contempt case was filed on 30.08.2025. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that respondent No.2 has violated the order dated 25.02.2025. 6. As seen from the material placed before this Court, the respondents have completed the inquiry and passed a speaking order vide R.C.No:531/2024/H.R.M.S, dated 29.12.2025. 7. Since a speaking order was passed on 29.12.2025, however, with some delay, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 25.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.4312 of 2025. p. 3 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.02.2026 TVN p. 4 129 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.2366 OF 2025 Date: 05.02.2026 TVN