( 2026:JHHC:6185 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1317 of 2026 ------ Sunil Bhaskar @ Sunil Kumar, aged about 31 years, son of Raju Ram @ Raju Bhaskar, resident of Police Line Road, Gaya, P.O.-Shahmeer & P.S.-Gaya, Dist.-Gaya (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10.03.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.193 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111/310(4)/310(5)/317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in possession of fire arms illegally and he was preparing to commit dacoity in a jewelry shop. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and no witness has been examined in this case till date. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.08.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 17.12.2025 and 25.11.2025 in B.A. Nos.10928 of 2025 and 10176 of 2025 respectively. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.193 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10.03.2026 Gunjan-