Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23818 (HP)

RAJMAN SINGH v. SHER SINGH

CMP/18944/2026 · 2026-09-21

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ramjan Singh vs. Sher Singh (deceased) through LRs & Ors. RSA No. 72 of 2009 21.09.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Het Ram, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a) to 1(e) and respondent No.2. CMP No. 18944 of 2026 After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e) and respondent No.2, submits that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed. In view of above, the present application is allowed and names of Ms. Vinod Kumari [respondent No. 1(e)] and Dharam Singh [proforma respondent No. 3] are ordered to be deleted subject to all just exceptions. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties. Amended memo of parties be filed within a period of one week. The application stands disposed of. RSA No. 72 of 2009 List the matter for consideration after four weeks. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21.09.2026 (ravinder)