Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23816 (JHR)

LALITA DEVI v. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/4725/2026 · 2026-08-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24722 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4725 of 2026 1. Lalita Devi, aged about 42 Years, Wife of Late Mangal Oraon, 2. Aman Oraon, aged about 22 years son of Late Mangal Oraon Both resident of Village- Chordhara, P.O.-Bhadaninagar, P.S.- Patratu, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand) ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. M/S Central Coalfields Limited through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Darbhanga House, P.O. & P.S.-Gonda, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. The Director Personnel, Central Coal Limited, having its office at Darbhanga House, P.O. & P.S-Gonda, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. The General Manager (HR/MP), Central Coal Limited, having its office at Darbhanga House, P.O. & P.S-Gonda, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 4. The Staff Officer (P&A), Central Coalfield Limited, having its office at Bhurkunda Colliery, Barka Sayal Area, P.O+P.S- Bhurkunda, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand) 5. The Project Officer, Central Coal Field Limited, having its office at Bhurkunda Colliery, P.O. & P.S.- Bhurkunda, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand) 6. The Assistant Manager (Karmik), Central Coal Field Limited, having its office at Bhurkunda Colliery, P.O. & P.S.- Bhurkunda, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand) 7. Regional Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund, Region-II, having its office at Darbhanga House, P.O. & P.S.-Gonda, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhola Nath Rajak, Advocate Mr. Paras Sharan Deo, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate -------- Order No. 2 /Dated: 17th August 2026 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to take appropriate remedy. 2026:JHHC:24722 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not raise objection. 3. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th August 2026 Amit Uploaded on 19/08/2026