216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6138-2026 Date of Decision: 08.06.2026 Zahid Parvez …Petitioner vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and others. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. R.S.Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Ankush Dhanerwal, Advocate with Mr. Prageet Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.5. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. Short reply by way of an affidavit of Senior Superintendent of Police (Security & Traffic), Union Territory, Chandigarh has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State in Court today and the same is taken on record. 2. In view of the reply filed by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the instant petition. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.06.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.06.08 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document