RUDRAKSH MANAWA v. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TH. ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2330/2026 · 2026-08-03
Sanjay Parihar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2380 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2380 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2330/2026 CM No. 5041/2026
Rudraksh Manawa …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Aradhay Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate.
Vs
Jammu Development Authority & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 03.08.2026
01. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent developments, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. His statement is taken on record.
02. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Parihar)
Judge
Jammu 03.08.2026 Renu
Sr. No.15