Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040001112026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/34/2026 Soche Tayang and 9 Ors Son of Khukui Tayang, Village Lamaliang, PO and PS Hayuliang, Anjaw District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Yupamso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Soche Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Chohenso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Bajum Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Basanso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Khoying Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Lijenso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Runum Tayang Page No.# 2/4 Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Jenemso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Balailum Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 7: Atolum Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Khuying Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 8: Khuying Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Late Khuku Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 9: Baso Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Sopang Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 10: Bajum Tayang Age: Occupation : Son of Late K Tayang Village Lamaliang PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Page No.# 3/4 Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Khuti Mithi and Anr Son of Late Mawhihum Mithi, resident of Old Pukhuri Village, PO and PS Wakro, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Smti Pomtheliang Mithi Age: 0 Occupation : Wife of Late Karaso Mithi resident of Khinbum Village PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh. 79210 Advocate for the Petitioner : Duge Soki, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 28.01.2026 Heard Mr. D. Soki, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. R. Basar, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, and Mr. M. Khambo, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed seeking impleadment of opposite party Nos. 1 and 2, namely Shri Khuti Mithi and Smti. Pomtheliang Mithi as party respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 599(AP)/2025. 3. It is submitted that the above-named two persons were respondents in the earlier round of proceedings with regard to the ownership rights over the disputed land; however, inadvertently, the said opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 were not made as party respondents in the present writ petition. Page No.# 4/4 4. By filing this application, the applicant/writ petitioner prays for their impleadment as respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in the aforementioned WP(C) No. 599(AP)/2025. 5. The prayer so made by the learned counsel for the applicant has not been objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. 6. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed. 7. Let the opposite parties, namely Shri Khuti Mithi and Smti. Pomtheliang Mithi, be impleaded as party respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in the aforesaid writ petition being WP(C) No. 599(AP)/2025. 8. With the above observations, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant