Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2380 (CHH)

SUNIL CHELANI v. AMIT JOSH

ACQA/107/2020 · 2026-01-06

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:834-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 107 of 2020 Sunil Chelani S/o Late Ramchand Chalani Aged About 20 Years R/o Near Gol Market, Vaishali Nagar Chowki, Vaishali Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Amit Josh S/o Archi Josh Aged About 24 Years R/o Sector 06, H. No. 06/31/1f, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - D. Ajay Kumar S/o D. Dhalu Aged About 20 Years R/o Sector 06, H. No. 56/01/f, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sunil Ramteke @ Raja S/o Gwal Ram Aged About 24 Years R/o Near Sahupara Anganbadi, Ward No. 13, Ramnagar, Police Station Supela, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Advocate. Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey, J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal, J. Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 Order on Board Per, Rajani Dubey, Judge 07.01.2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the main accused/ Respondent No. 1/Amit Josh died on 09.11.2024 i.e., during the pendency of this appeal and he does not want to press this appeal against the other accused persons. 2. Learned State counsel has submitted the postmortem report of the main accused/Respondent No. 1- Amit Josh and stated that he does not dispute with the fact as stated by counsel for the appellant. 3. In view of death of the main accused/respondent No. 1-Amit Josh and as statement made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the postmortem report dated 09.11.2024 of the deceased produced by the counsel for the State, it has been duly verified that the main accused died during the pendency of this appeal. However, learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press this appeal against the other accused persons. 4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge AMIT PATEL