IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.142 CRWP-6828-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.06.2026 Sneha and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Jonti Phogat Advocate, for the petitioner Through video conferencing. Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioners from the hands of private respondents No.4 to 6 and other relatives of petitioner No.1 as they are harassing the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.4 to 6 submits that the private respondents are giving no threat to the petitioners and are not interfering in the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. In light of the abovesaid submission, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the present petition. RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.06.08 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6828-2026 (O&M) 2 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for revival of the same, if any cause still survives. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 08.06.2026 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.06.08 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document