Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23792 (KAR)

SRI.M.GOVINDAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16878/2026 · 2026-06-23

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30995 WP No. 16878 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16878 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M. GOVINDAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O APPASANDRA VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK-562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SMT. M. MAMATHA W/O NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O APPASANDRA VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK-562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. SRI. K.RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O APPASANDRA VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK-562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR BHAT A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30995 WP No. 16878 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT CHAPPARADAKALLU DEVANAHALLI POST-562110 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. THE THASILDAR, HOSAKOTE TALUK HOSAKOTE - 562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.05.2026 AS VIDE ANNX-H, H1 AND H2.A- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30995 WP No. 16878 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for writ of mandamus to the respondents to consider the representation produced at Annexure- H series. 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is noticed that the petitioners have produced the grant certificates at Annexures–F and G series. 5. In that view of the matter, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider the representations produced at Annexure–H series submitted by the petitioners, in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30995 WP No. 16878 of 2026 accordance with law, after verifying the original records available in its office, and take an appropriate decision in the matter within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20