30.01.2026 Court No.28 Item No.46 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 4426 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Joypur P.S. Case No.176 of 2025 dated 14.10.2025 under Sections 126(2) / 115(2) / 117(2) / 109 / 74 / 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Kachiram Dolui & Ors. ….Petitioners. Ms. Ipsita Ghosh ….for the petitioners Ms. Debjani Sahu ….for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. No grievous injury was caused to anyone. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She relies on the statements of the victim recorded before the learned Magistrate and the statements of the eye- witnesses. The petitioners have been implicated in the statements of witnesses. As per the medical report, it appears that the victim suffered skull fracture. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)