[2026:JHHC:24547] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7691 of 2026 ------ Tabbasir Khan @ Tavasir Khan aged about 21 years, S/o Irsad Khan, r/o Village- Patratu, P.O.- Kaima, P.S.- Latehar, District- Latehar (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.N. Ojha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-17-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 21 (b), 22 (b), 29 of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the possession of the petitioner as well as the co-accused taken together, 5.73 gm of Brown Sugar was seized, out of which 0.689 grams of Brown Sugar was seized from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and if taken individually, the seized Brown Sugar from the possession of the petitioner, comes under small quantity and if taken jointly, the seized Brown Sugar comes under intermediate quantity. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7961 of 2026. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the bail application and he has been in jail custody since 29.05.2026, as mentioned in para 01 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. case No. 90 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.08.2026 Amar/