Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23778 (CHH)

MOHD. AZHARUDDIN ANSARI v. PRAVEEN KUMAR VASTRAKAR

MCC/506/2026 · 2026-06-29

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26535 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 506 of 2026 1 - Mohd. Azharuddin Ansari S/o Mohd. Khalil Aged About 25 Years R/o Butapara, Deorikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Praveen Kumar Vastrakar S/o Shri Ramadhar Vastrakar R/o Village Paraghat, Jairam Nagar, P.S. Masturi, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., Through The Owner Of The Vehicle Govind Bagde, Aged About 44 Years, S/o Late Dev Rao Bagde, R/o Hemu Nagar, Ward No. 43, Ganpati Chowk, Near Sai Mandir, Behind Narayani Plot, Hemu Nagar, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of The Vehicle) 2 - Govind Bagde S/o Late Dev Raj Bagde Aged About 44 Years R/o Hemu Nagar, Ward No. 43, Ganpati Chowk, Near Sai Mandir, Behind Narayani Plot, Hemu Nagar, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of The Vehicle) 3 - I.C.I.C.I. Lombard Insurance Co. Ltd. Ground Floor, Vanijya Bhawan, Devendra Nagar Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Branch Office At HARNEET KAUR Digitally signed by HARNEET KAUR Date: 2026.07.01 14:06:28 +0530 2 V.R. Plaza, Near Deep Hotel, Link Raod, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of The Vehicle) ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anurag Agrawal, Advocate SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 30.06.2026 1. The present MCC has been filed under Section 152 read with Section 151 of CPC for correction of a typographical error in judgment dated 22/04/2026 passed by this Court in MAC/1602/2019 (Annexure P-1). 2. Inadvertently, in paragraph 6 of the award, the total compensation awarded by this Court has been mentioned as Rs. 6,29,543/-, however, it ought to be Rs. 5,82,043/- and as a result, in paragraph 7 of the award, the compensation enhanced by this Court has been mentioned as Rs. 1,83,060/- whereas it would come to Rs. 1,35,560/-. 3. Thus, the total compensation awarded by this Court, as mentioned in paragraph 6 of the award, be read as Rs. 5,82,043/- and the additional amount enhanced by this Court, as mentioned in paragraph 7 of the award, be read as 3 Rs. 1,35,560/-. The rest of the impugned award as passed by this Court shall remain intact. 4. Accordingly, the instant MCC is allowed and the impugned award is modified to the extent indicated herein-above. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet