APHC010452522017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18753/2017 Between: 1. GOLUGURI AMMY REDDY, S/O CHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO D. NO 3-60, BALABADRAPURAM, BIKKAVOLU EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE (EXCISE- II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION, AND EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VISHAKAPATNAM. 4. THE PROHIBITION AND EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISHAKAPATNAM DIST. 5. THE PROHIBITION AND EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT GAJUWAKA, VISHAKAPATANAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings being Rc.No.98/2017/A dated 1.6.2017 issued by Respondent no.5 pending disposal of writ petition and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 22872 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents to consider the representation dated NIL of the petitioner for refund / adjust the amount already paid towards license fee of Rs.16.25 lakhs for the period commencing 1.4.2017 to 30.6.2017 by 2 setting aside the impugned proceedings being Rc.No.98/2017/A dated 1.6.2017 issued by Respondent no.5 and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BAPI RAJU NANDURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP) 2. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.18753 of 2017 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.01.2026 KBN/JAK 4 10 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 18753 of 2017 Date: 31.01.2026 KBN/JAK