Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23772 (JHR)

GOLU KUMAR @ GOLU MALAKAR @ AMIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7727/2026 · 2026-08-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24743] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7727 of 2026 ------ Golu Kumar @ Golu Malakar @ Amit Kumar; aged about 21 years, S/o Satan Ram, R/o Bansidih, Chas, P.O. & P.S. Chas, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. ... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 664 of 2026, consequent S.T. Case No. 239 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a member of the gang headed by notorious criminal Aman Sao and he was actively involved in collection of extortion. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is also submitted that petitioner has only been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of co- accused namely Prince Kumar @ Bhatia. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.04.2026 as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that though, charge-sheet has been submitted but no witness has been examined as yet. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 664 of 2026, consequent S.T. Case No. 239 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.08.2026 Amar/