APHC010453802012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 789/2012 Between: 1. VEMUGANTY VENKATA RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O LATE RAMA NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, PROPERTY, 74-10-2, PRAKASHNAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. D P S KRISHNA RAO 4 OTS, S/O LATE D.V.RAINARAO, PROPERTY, FLAT NO.1 . 2ND FLOOR, ADITYA ENCLAVE, 59-2-8, P&T COLONY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SMT P LAKSHMI, W/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, 104, PUJA TOWERS, 3-6-711/1, STREET NO.9, HIMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD-29. 3. SMT LCHANDRAMATHI, W/O LATE K.RAGHAVA RAO, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, 48-17-4, 51, SUNDAR PLAZA, GANDHIPURAM-1, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SMT PURASA ATCHAYAMMA, STYLING HERSELF AS DASTRALA RAMANA, HINDU, 80-32-2/1, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE, AV APPA RAO ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 5. SAI KISHORE, STYLING HIMSELF AS DASTRALA SAI KISHORE, HINDU, 80-32-2/1, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE, AV APPA RAO ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1196 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delay 6 days may be condoned and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. UTTARA LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 789/2012 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 23.12.2025, the following order was passed: “At the request made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant, post after Sankranthi Vacation, 2026. 2. It is made clear that no further adjournment would be entertained.” 2. Inspite of the opportunity granted, today also learned counsel for the appellant prays for further time to obtain instructions. However, it was clearly recorded in the earlier order that no further adjournment would be entertained. 3. We do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. 4. The matter pertains to the year 2012 and is listed under the caption „old matters‟. The cause-list mentions that the old matters may not be adjourned. 5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for „want of prosecution‟. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 09.02.2026 AG 216 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 789/2012 Dated: 09.02.2026 AG