Vakil Miya @ Kyamuddin Miya @ Kyamuddin Ansari v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./40687/2026 · 2026-07-08
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23766 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23766 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40687 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- Haraiya District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vakil Miya @ Kyamuddin Miya @ Kyamuddin Ansari S/o Jamaluddin Ansari R/o Village - Jumman Chouk, Tumariya Tola, P.S. - Haraiya, Distt. - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Khushi Awadh, Advocate For the State : Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Haraiya P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 instituted under Sections 21(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. 3. As per the prosecution, police raided the house of a co accused acting on a secret information and recovered commercial quantity of various intoxicating medicines. The following recoveries were made from the house of the petitioner:- i. Proximo-Spas 288 capsules,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40687 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 ii. Tramadol 1720 capsules, iii.Nitrazepam ip 10 mg 5940 tables, iv. I-SPA-Pro 144 capsules, v. Onscen Syrup 36 pieces of 100 ml each, vi. Berrycof syrup 39 pieces of 100ml each, vii. Codinext Syrup 4 pieces of 100ml each, viii. Wiscorex Syrup 17 pieces of 100ml each, ix.Onerex Syrup 4 pieces of 100 ml
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. The petitioner is alleged to be dealing in narcotic substance and his role has come in the self inculpatory statement of co-accused Suraj Kumar. 7. Considering the fact that the co-accused Suraj Kumar from whose possession huge amount of contraband is recovered, has taken the name of the petitioner, to be the seller of the contraband, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 9. The petitioner may surrender within two weeks from today and pray for regular bail. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40687 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3
10.
It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case. P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T