[2026:JHHC:24026] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7553 of 2026 ------ Shyam Sundar @ Shyam Sundar Singh, aged about 39 years, Son of Mangi Ram, Resident of Village-Dhanupura, Post-Office- kakrala, Police Station- Kadar Chowk, District- Budaun, State Uttar Pradesh. ... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-12-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner looted the gold and silver jewelry worth Rs. 15 lakhs from the shop of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has only been implicated in this case on the basis of his confessional statement made in connection with Suti P.S. Jangipur (Murshidabad) (W.B) Case no. 1376 of 2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion and no recovery has been made. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., and without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.02.2026 as mentioned in para- 01 and has no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 16 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 12.08.2026 Amar/