[2026:RJ-JP:16998] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6133/2026 Rajmohan S/o Ramkaran, R/o Phulwada (Khandeep), Police Station Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankul Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.25/2025 registered at Police Station Karauli Sadar, District Karauli for offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the theft of a tractor. The petitioner has been in custody since 20.02.2025. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:16998] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6133/2026] 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender and as many as 29 similar criminal cases are pending against him primarily relating to theft and allied offences. This clearly reflects the criminal nature and propensity of the petitioner to commit such offences. Considering the pendency of similar cases, his criminal past, there is every likelihood that the petitioner, if released on bail, would indulge in similar offences again, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of bail. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and the material available on record, especially that the criminal antecedents of petitioner indicate a pattern of repeated involvement in similar offences, which disentitle the petitioner from the discretionary relief of bail. 6. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is hereby dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/51