Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23757 (AP)

Enimireddy.Koteswara Rao v. Sri.T. Ramesh Babu

CC/2333/2025 · 2026-03-12

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010446902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2333/2025 Between: 1. ENIMIREDDY.KOTESWARA RAO, S/O CHENCHI REDDY, AGE 45, CULTIVATION, D.NO.1-15, JUWIGUNTA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI T RAMESH BABU, Station House Officer, Marripudi Police Station, Prakasam District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for their willful and deliberate disobedience to the order dated 04.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.8665/2025 of this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH NAGENDRA SARMA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: 2 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent was on other official duty and that the notice ordered by this Court was received in the police station and it was not brought to the notice of this Court. 2. It is submitted that the orders of this Court are complied with and a counter to that effect is filed. Perused the counter. 3. It is stated in the counter that the respondent is not interfering in the civil dispute and that the respondent had to respond to a call which was received on 04.05.2025 and the respondent attended the call and visited the disputed site and pacified the situation and advised the counsel for both parties not to create any law and order issue. 4. Recording the same, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.03.2026 PNS