Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010012452026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/168/2026 INTEGRATED SYSTEMS AND SERVICES 3B, KALINDI PLAZA, DR. J.C. DASS ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SHRI UTPAL HAZARIKA. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THEBRGOVERNMENT OF INDIA,MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,THE SECRETARY,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVT. OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE ROOM NO. 76 NEW DELHI-110001. 3:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI- 110001. 4:THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN Page No.# 2/4 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI-110066. 5:REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA NDCC-II BUILDING JAI SINGH ROAD NEW DELHI- 110001 NRC DIVISION. 6:THE EMPLOYEEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER NORTH EAST REGION G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005 ASSAM. 7:THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION NORTH EAST REGION G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. 8:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS ASSAM FIRST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA BHARALUPAR BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI ASSAM. 9:ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REGIONAL OFFICER N.E. REGION Page No.# 3/4 G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. 10:THE RECOVERY OFFICER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION N.E. REGION G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-781005. 11:WIPRO LIMITED RAJGARH ROAD 2ND FLOOR RAJGARH GUWAHATI- 781001 REGISTERED OFFICE- WIPRO LTD. DODDAKANNELLI SARJAPUR ROAD BANGALORE- 560035 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DEKA, MR G SARMA,MS. C TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NRC,SC, PF,MR. A SANDILYA (R-11) Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 11.02.2026 The present application has been instituted by the applicant, who is the petitioner in the connected writ petition being WP(C).No.3411/2023, for deletion of the name of respondent no.11 from the array of the respondents in the said writ petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. On a perusal of the contentions made in the Interlocutory Application and on appreciating the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer made in the present application mandates acceptance. Accordingly, the name of the respondent no.11 in the connected writ petition is permitted to be deleted from the array of respondents. With the above observations and directions, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant