[2026:JHHC:25259 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7358 of 2026 Indrajit Kumar @ Kundan Singh @ Inderjeet @ Kundan, aged about 31 years, son of Taleshwar Singh, resident of village- Desari, P.O. &P.S.- Desari, Dist.- Vaishali (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhouri Awinash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Soumya Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashishta, Spl. PP 02 / 20.08.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. no. 59 of 2026 arising out of Madhupur P. S. case no. 146 of 2025 (G.R. no. 90 of 2026) instituted under Section 310 (2) of the BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an organised gang of criminals, committed dacoity and looted Rs. 1,64,25,250/- and gold packets from HDFC bank, Madhupur. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and drawing attention of the court to the para 4 of the supplementary affidavit, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no TIP has been conducted in respect of the petitioner though the petitioner has been in jail custody since 27.10.2025, as mentioned in para 9 of this bail application. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no witness has been examined in this case and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused person- Akash Kumar, who has already been admitted on bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 04.06.2026 passed in B.A. No. 4757 of 2026. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Madhupur in connection with S.T. no. 59 of 2026 arising out of Madhupur P. S. case no. 146 of 2025 (G.R. no. 90 of 2026) with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 20.08.2026 Smita/-