Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31459 WP No. 17934 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 17934 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SMT NAGARATNAMMA G W/O KRISHNEGOWDA P K, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A PADUGUDI VILLAGE, CS PURA POST, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572213. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. YASHWANTH NETHAJI N.T..,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560001.
2.
GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION CIRCLE, N R SQUARE, BENGALURU 560027.
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31459 WP No. 17934 of 2026
3.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HEROHALLI SUB-DIVISION, ANJANANAGAR, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE 560091.
4.
SUMITHRA M, W/O GOKUL H, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/A DODDASULIKERE VILLAGE, LAKSHMIPURA POST, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 561201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KENCHEGOWDA., AGA FOR R1;
SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE- E DATED 22/05/2026 AND PREVENT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FROM PUTTING UP ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT LEAVING ANY SET BACK; B.
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 CORPORATION TO DEMOLISH THE VIOLATED CONSTRUCTION OF THE RESPONDENT NO.4 IN HIS PROPERTY BEARING SITE NO.36 AND SITE NO.37
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31459 WP No. 17934 of 2026
BEARING ASSESSMENT NUMBER 43 AND 40 SITUATED AT LINGADEERANAHALLI VILLAGE, YASHWANTHPUR HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Sri Yashwanth Nethaji N T, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a memo for withdrawal which reads as under:
“WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition in case need arises, in the interest of justice and equity.”
The memo is accepted, and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-