ALAVALA PEDDA VENKATA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/22939/2024 · 2026-01-01
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23740 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23740 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010445982024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22939/2024 Between:
1. ALAVALA PEDDA VENKATA REDDY, S/O.PEDDA THIPPA REDDY, AGE70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O.UTAKALLU VILLAGE, GOOTY MANDALAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. ALAVALA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O.VENKATA REDDY, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O.UTAKALLU VILLAGE, GOOTY MANDALAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. AIAVALA NARAYANA REDDY,, S/O.VENKATA REDDY, AGE 53 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O.UTAKALLU VILLAGE, GOOTY MANDALAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOOTY POLICE STATION, GOOTY ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. ALAVALA CHINNA VENKATA REDDY, , S/O.NARAYANA REDDY, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O.UTAKALLU VILLAGE, GOOTY MANDALAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent calling the petitioners to the Police Station at the instance of 4th respondent knowingly it is purely civil dispute, for illegal settlement of land in Sy.No.55/B an extent of Ac.3.30 cents at Utakallu Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in to the Civil dispute in to the petitioners agricultural land in Sy.No.55/B an extent of Ac.3.30 cents at Utakallu Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in to the Civil dispute in to the petitioners agricultural land in Sy.No.55/B an extent of Ac.3.30 cents at Utakallu Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22939/2024
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent calling the petitioners to the Police Station at the instance of 4th respondent knowingly it is purely civil dispute, for illegal settlement of land in Sy.No.55/B an extent of Ac.3.30 cents at Utakallu Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in to the Civil dispute in to the petitioners agricultural land in Sy.No.55/B an extent of Ac.3.30 cents at Utakallu Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass such.…”
2. None represented on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that the police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties and , and that two cases, vide Crime Nos. 86 of 2023 and 77 of 2023, were registered against both parties. Subsequently, both cases were closed as compromised before the Lok Adalat Bench, Gooty.
4. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 02.01.2026 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
106
WRIT PETITION NO: 22939/2024 Dated 02.01.2026
KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 22939/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
02.01.2026
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP,J KKV