Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23739 (MAD)

Karupaiyee @ Kothai v. The District Collector,

WP Crl.(MD)/1835/2026 · 2026-04-02

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.04.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 Karupaiyee @ Kothai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.Thasildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Deputy Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Adhanoor, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai. 6.The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 7.Ponnammal 8.Ramasamy ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to take action against the seventh and eighth respondents for their illegal activities by blocking the pathway in Aranmanaipatti, Adhanoor Post, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Civil side) For R5 & R6 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.Since no adverse order is likely to be passed against the respondents 7 and 8, notice to them is dispensed with. 3.Seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to take action against the seventh and eighth respondents for their illegal activities by blocking the pathway in Aranmanaipatti, Adhanoor Post, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District, the present petition is filed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 4.When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that already an enquiry was conducted by the respondent police, where the petitioner as well as the respondents 7 and 8 had given a written undertaking that they will resolve their disputes before the competent civil Court, based on which, despite CSR is issued, the said complaint was closed. 5.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, directing the petitioner and the respondents 7 and 8 to resolve their dispute by approaching the competent civil forum, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 02.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Rmk 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 TO:- 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.Thasildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Deputy Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Adhanoor, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai. 6.The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Rmk Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1835 of 2026 Dated 02.04.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis