Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23738 (KAR)

sri prakasha v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16794/2026 · 2026-06-23

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30990 WP No. 16794 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16794 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PRAKASHA S/O LATE MOODALA GIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT BEKKALALE VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 571425. PRESENTLY R/AT NO.4034, 1ST CROSS, CHANDAGAALU LAYOUT, SHANKARANAGARA, MANDYA - 571401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJU H.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA-571401. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30990 WP No. 16794 of 2026 3. THE TAHSILDAR MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA- 571428. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571425. 5. PREMA, W/O APPAJI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 6. MANGALAGOWRAMMA W/O LATE BILEGOWDA, AGEDABOUT 60 YEARS. 7. PUTTAMMA, D/O CHANNEGOWDA, W/O SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 7 R/AT BEKKALALE VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571425. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; NOTICE TO R5 TO R7 DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 - TAHSILDAR MADDUR TALUK, TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN R. MISC NO. 682/2023 VIDE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30990 WP No. 16794 of 2026 ANNEXURE-C BY CONSIDERING THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 01.07.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-D IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the non-implementation of the order dated 27.02.2025 passed by respondent No.2 in Regular Misc. No.682/2023, produced at Annexure-C. 4. Having regard to the said grievance and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30990 WP No. 16794 of 2026 representation dated 01.07.2024 (Annexure-D) submitted by the petitioner, in the light of the order dated 27.02.2025 passed by respondent No.2, and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19