Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23738 (AP)

K.HARI KIRSHNA RAO,VSP v. EPDCL,CHAIRMAN&M.D,VSP,&ANOT

WP/16208/2013 · 2026-03-17

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010445492013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16208/2013 Between: 1. K.HARI KIRSHNA RAO,VSP, S/O LAXMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, WORKING AS AAE, QA DEPARTMENT, CORPORATE OFFICE, APEPDCL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. EPDCL CHAIRMANM D VSP ANOT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OPERATIONS HRD, APEPDCL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: i) declare the impugned memo No. HRD / DC / PO - II / F.No. 1474 / 09 / D.No.754/12, dt.18-12-2012 issued by the 1st respondent and memo No.HRD/DC/PO-II/F.No.39/13/D.No.83/13, Dt.13-02-2013 issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same ii) consequently direct the respondents to restore the increment deferred or sought to be deferred pursuant to the impugned memo No.HRD/DC/POII/F.No.1474/09/D.No.754/12, dt.18-12-2012 issued by the lst respondent and memo No.HRD/DC/PO-II/F.No.39/13/D.No.83/13, Dt.13-02- 2013 issued by the 2nd respondent, duly granting all other consequential and attendant benefits 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 19632 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned memo No.HRD/DC/PO-II/F.No.1474/09/D.NO.754/12, dt.18-12-2012 issued by the 1st respondent and memo No.HRD/DC/PO- II/F.No.39/13/D.No.83/13, Dt.13-02-2013 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 126499 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 50474 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 18.03.2026 SR