Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:26259
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3169 of 2026 1 - Suresh Kumar Gupta S/o Mahabir Gupta Aged About 38 Years R/o Agrasen Chowk, Ward No. 8, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi
Chhattisgarh 4 - Land Acquisition Officer District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer P W D, Pendra, Division Pendra Road, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate For State :- Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order On Board 29.06.2026
1. Heard. VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR
2
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate application under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection in case such an application is filed by the petitioner under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the petitioner is
directed to file an appropriate application under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in respect of the grievance raised in the present petition. In turn, the authorities concerned are directed to consider and decide the said application in accordance with law, expeditiously.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha